Advisory Engagement

AI Strategy & Roadmapping — know what to build before you build it.

Most AI initiatives fail before a line of code is written — wrong use case, no data readiness, no executive alignment. We run a structured advisory engagement that ends with a scored, sequenced roadmap your whole organisation can commit to.

See the case study ↓
2–4wkEngagement length
12moRoadmap horizon
100%Use cases scored
All evals passing
elhaa · strategy engagement
1Discovery Workshops
2Opportunity Scoring Matrix
3Roadmap & Business Case
4Governance Handoff
Scored, not guessed
What's included

A complete roadmap, not a slide deck.

Structured discovery, honest scoring, and a business case leadership can actually approve.

Structured discovery workshops

Sessions with every relevant department to surface real bottlenecks, not the loudest opinion in the room.

02

Opportunity scoring matrix

Every candidate initiative scored on business value, data readiness, and delivery risk — on one page.

03

Sequenced 12-month roadmap

A dated plan with named owners and phases, not an open-ended “innovation backlog.”

04

Budget & ROI modelling

Cost ranges benchmarked against comparable delivered work, with expected return per initiative.

05

Board-ready presentation

A leadership-facing deck you can present as-is, not a technical document nobody outside IT reads.

Engineering deep dive

How the scoring actually works.

The evaluation topology and a real scoring snippet — not a black-box consulting matrix.

1Candidate Use Cases Gathered from Workshops
2Scored on Value, Feasibility & Data Readiness
3Ranked & Sequenced into 12-Month Roadmap
4Leadership Review & Sign-Off
opportunity-score.ts
// elhaa Opportunity Scoring Model
const score = scoreUseCase({
  businessValue: 8,      // 1-10, stakeholder-rated
  dataReadiness: 6,     // 1-10, audited
  deliveryRisk: 3,       // 1-10, lower is safer
  weighting: 'balanced'
});
// -> { rank: 2, tier: 'quarter-one', confidence: 0.82 }
Case study

A 12-Month Roadmap That Actually Shipped

Manufacturing · Multi-site industrial group

The challenge

Leadership had approved an “AI budget” with no shortlist — three departments were independently evaluating vendors for overlapping use cases, and none had validated data readiness.

The approach

We ran discovery across six departments, scored eleven candidate use cases, and sequenced the top three into a roadmap with named owners and quarterly milestones — killing two of the original three department proposals as lower-value.

Department workshops → use-case intake → scoring matrix → sequenced roadmap → board approval
11→3Use cases shortlisted
100%Departments aligned
3wkDiscovery to roadmap

*Illustrative example based on a representative engagement.

The difference

The typical approach vs the elhaa approach.

Typical approach
With elhaa
Starting point
“Let's try some AI stuff”, no clear priority
A ranked shortlist scored on value and feasibility
Ownership
IT experiments alone, leadership finds out later
Leadership and IT align on the roadmap together
Timeline
Open-ended “innovation project”
A dated 12-month roadmap with named milestones
Success measure
Activity — pilots launched
Outcomes — value delivered per quarter
How the engagement runs

Four steps from workshop to roadmap.

1

Discovery workshops

Structured sessions with stakeholders to surface real bottlenecks, not assumed ones.

2

Opportunity scoring

Every candidate use case scored on business value, data readiness, and delivery risk.

3

Roadmap & business case

A sequenced 12-month plan with named owners, budget ranges, and expected ROI per initiative.

4

Governance handoff

Roadmap handed to delivery teams (ours or yours) with clear success criteria per phase.

How success is measured

Agreed in week one, on a dashboard by go-live.

Clarity

Use cases scored

Every candidate initiative rated on value, feasibility, and data readiness.

Alignment

Stakeholder sign-off

Leadership and technical teams agree the roadmap before a line of code is written.

Realism

Budget accuracy

Cost ranges benchmarked against comparable delivered engagements, not guesses.

Velocity

Time to first pilot

How quickly the top-ranked use case can move into a Diagnose Sprint.

Works with your tools

Typical systems & standards.

Stakeholder workshopsValue/effort scoring matrixData readiness auditCompetitive & industry scanBoard-ready roadmap deckBudget modelling
Who's involved

Small teams on both sides.

From elhaa
  • Strategy leadRuns discovery workshops and owns the scoring model.
  • Solutions architectSanity-checks technical feasibility of each candidate use case.
  • Industry analystBenchmarks against comparable AI initiatives in your sector.
From your side
  • Executive sponsorSets the mandate and attends the roadmap read-out.
  • Department leads2–3 hours each in discovery workshops.
  • Data & IT leadConfirms what data and systems are realistically available.
FAQ

Questions about AI Strategy & Roadmapping.

We're engineers first — every use case on the roadmap is scored against what we know is actually buildable, not just what sounds good in a slide. Many roadmaps we write convert directly into a Diagnose Sprint with us or another vendor.

Typically 2–4 weeks depending on organisation size and how many stakeholders need to be interviewed.

No. The roadmap and business case are yours to take anywhere. Many clients do continue with us since we already understand the context, but there's no lock-in.

That's common, and exactly what the data-readiness scoring is for — it flags which use cases need a Data Engineering engagement first, rather than letting you find out mid-build.

Yes — it's designed to be a living document. Most clients revisit it quarterly, and we're happy to run that review with you.

Sounds like your situation?

A 30-minute call. We'll tell you honestly whether this is the right solution — and what it would take.

Explore other services